Breaking SUPREME COURT REAFFIRMS PUBLIC DOMAIN PROTECTION FOR DIGITAL LAWS
New Delhi · Monday, 21 September 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2017-08-10 partly_allowed

Shoeline vs Commissioner of Service Tax & Ors

Bench: 2 — A.K. Sikri

In Brief

The appellant, Shoeline, was served a show cause notice for non-payment of service tax on commission paid to overseas agents (July 2004–March 2006), which the Department assessed under 'Business Auxiliary Service'. The appellant's objections were rejected and the demand confirmed in 2008. However, the appellant did not challenge this order promptly, paid the tax in instalments over years, and filed a writ petition only in 2012—four years later. The High Court dismissed the petition as barred by delay and laches. The Supreme Court upheld the dismissal but held that although the appellant remains bound by the substantive tax demand (no refund), it should not be required to pay penalty and interest on a tax that was not payable in law (service tax liability arose only after April 18, 2006, when Section 66A was inserted). The appeal was partly allowed by waiving interest and penalty.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Service Tax Delay and Laches Administrative Law Tax Liability Writ Jurisdiction

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login