Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Friday, 31 July 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2024-10-21 allowed

SHYAM NARAYAN RAM vs STATE OF U.P. & ANR. ETC

Bench: 2 — Vikram Nath, Prasanna B. Varale

In Brief

In this 1998 murder case, the Trial Court convicted four accused for killing two Scheduled Caste victims, relying partly on documents admitted as genuine by defence counsel under Section 294 CrPC and eyewitness testimony. The Allahabad High Court remitted the case for retrial, holding the accused had been deprived of fair trial. The Supreme Court allowed the appeal and set aside the High Court's remand order, holding that Section 294 CrPC permits conviction based on admitted documents without formal proof of author signatures. The Trial Court properly appreciated credible eyewitness evidence and was not obliged to recall formal witnesses when defence counsel had deliberately and repeatedly admitted documents. The High Court was directed to decide the criminal appeals afresh on merits.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Criminal Procedure Evidence Fair Trial Eyewitness Testimony Document Admission Conviction Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login