Breaking SUPREME COURT REAFFIRMS PUBLIC DOMAIN PROTECTION FOR DIGITAL LAWS
New Delhi · Sunday, 20 September 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2017-09-05 dismissed

Siddalingayya vs Gurulingappa & Ors

Bench: 2 — Abhay Manohar Sapre

In Brief

A plaintiff challenged the High Court's order remanding a civil suit for fresh trial after the defendants failed to file their written statement on time. The defendants were given opportunity to file the written statement on payment of cost (Rs. 11,250) as pre-condition. The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's approach, holding that procedural law must not be interpreted too technically to frustrate justice. The Trial Court should have granted reasonable additional time to defendants to file written statement subject to payment of cost to compensate the plaintiff, aligned with principles of natural justice that no one should be condemned unheard."

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Civil Procedure Natural Justice Trial Practice Cost Procedural Law Remand

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login