Breaking Supreme Court of India Advocates Balanced Approach to Diwali Firecracker Regulations
New Delhi · Wednesday, 28 October 2026
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2016-03-14 remanded

Siddharth Chaturvedi & Ors vs Securities and Exchange Board of India

Bench: 2 — <UNKNOWN>, <UNKNOWN>

In Brief

Three appellants challenged penalties imposed for technical violations of insider trading regulations. The Adjudicating Officer and Securities Appellate Tribunal imposed penalties of Rs. 5–11 lakhs despite appellants' argument that the breach was technical, involving minimal transaction value with no actual gain or investor loss. The Supreme Court found itself unable to reconcile two conflicting judicial interpretations of Sections 15A and 15J of the SEBI Act regarding an Adjudicating Officer's discretion to reduce penalties. The Court referred the matter to a larger Bench, finding that accepting one interpretation would violate principles of harmonious construction and potentially breach fundamental rights, while pending the referral, interim orders protecting the appellants remained in force.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Securities Regulation Administrative Law Statutory Interpretation Penalty Provisions Insider Trading Fundamental Rights

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login