Breaking Supreme Court of India Advocates Balanced Approach to Diwali Firecracker Regulations
New Delhi · Saturday, 07 November 2026
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2016-12-16 dismissed

Siddharth Mehta vs Union of India And Anr

Bench: 2 — <UNKNOWN>, <UNKNOWN>

In Brief

This writ petition challenged the constitutional validity of the Pradhan Mantri Garib Kalyan Yojana, 2016, which imposed penalties, surcharges, and a four-year lock-in on income disclosed under the voluntary disclosure scheme following demonetization. The petitioner argued the scheme could be better structured with lower penalties and tax credits for honest taxpayers. The Supreme Court held that it cannot substitute its judgment for the Executive's fiscal policy decisions merely because an alternative scheme might be preferable. Courts may only review whether a policy violates constitutional provisions, not redesign policies. The petition was dismissed as the policy's constitutional validity was not genuinely assailed.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Constitutional Law Taxation Judicial Review Separation of Powers Policy Making

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login