Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Monday, 10 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-02-21 dismissed

Soumitra Kumar Sen vs Shyamal Kumar Sen & Ors

Bench: 2 — A.K. Sikri

In Brief

Respondent filed a suit for declaration of leasehold rights and for injunctions against the appellant. The appellant sought rejection of the plaint, claiming it was barred by res judicata (two earlier unsuccessful suits filed by respondent) and lack of cause of action. The Supreme Court held that under Order VII Rule 11 CPC, res judicata being a mixed question of law and fact cannot be determined without evidence or framing issues. Only the plaint's averments can be examined; the defendant's written statement and external documents cannot be considered at the rejection stage. While establishing locus standi is necessary for granting injunctive relief, such matters must be resolved at trial, not during pleading-stage applications. Appeal dismissed."

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Civil Procedure Rejection of Plaint Res Judicata Partnership Locus Standi

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login