Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Monday, 03 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2021-07-23 dismissed

South Eastern Coalfields Ltd. & Ors vs S. Kumar’s Associates AKM (JV)

Bench: 2 — Sanjay Kishan Kaul

In Brief

South Eastern Coalfields Ltd., a Government company, floated a tender for equipment hiring and awarded it to the respondent via Letter of Intent (LoI) for Rs. 387.40 lakh. The LoI required the respondent to deposit 5% performance security and sign an Integrity Pact within 28 days, then execute a formal contract. The respondent mobilized equipment and commenced work but failed to deposit the security or execute the Integrity Pact. After work suspension, the company awarded the contract to another contractor at higher cost and sought recovery of the differential amount. The High Court held no concluded contract existed and allowed only forfeiture of bid security. The Supreme Court affirmed that the LoI merely expressed intention to contract, not a binding agreement, and that preconditions like security deposit were conditions precedent, not subsequent. Recovery of additional costs was therefore unavailable; only bid security forfeiture was permissible."

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Contract Law Tender and Procurement Civil Procedure Government Companies Conditions Precedent and Subsequent

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login