Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Monday, 10 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-05-03 allowed

Sree Anandhakumar Mills Ltd vs Indian Overseas Bank & Ors

Bench: 2 — <UNKNOWN>

In Brief

Sree Anandhakumar Mills Ltd, an auction purchaser, challenged a High Court order that held a partition suit by a third party (Nandini) maintainable and invalidated the auction sale. The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's order, holding that a suit for partition is not maintainable under Section 34 of the SARFAESI Act when debt recovery proceedings are pending. The Court found that the aggrieved party has an adequate remedy before the Debts Recovery Tribunal under Section 17 of the Act. The sale was confirmed, but the Court directed the purchaser not to transfer the property and permitted the respondent to file her claims before the DRT within 45 days.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Securitization Banking and Finance Debt Recovery Civil Procedure Jurisdiction of Courts Asset Recovery

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login