Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Thursday, 30 July 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2025-04-23 partly_allowed

SRI SHRIKANTH NS & ORS vs K. MUNIVENKATAPPA & ANR

Bench: 2 — Dipankar Datta, Prashant Kumar Mishra

In Brief

The appellants challenged orders by the High Court and First Appellate Court that had allowed the respondent to seek production of a Mutation Register during a regular appeal in a suit already dismissed at the plaint rejection stage. The Supreme Court held that Order 11 Rule 14 of the CPC (which permits production of documents during a suit) does not apply after a plaint has been rejected under Order VII Rule 11. An appellate court reviewing such a dismissal may only examine the validity of the rejection order, not the merits or require production of new documents. The Court set aside the order for document production but upheld the allowance of additional grounds in the appeal.",

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Civil Procedure Pleadings Appellate Practice Evidence and Production of Documents

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login