Breaking Supreme Court of India Advocates Balanced Approach to Diwali Firecracker Regulations
New Delhi · Wednesday, 28 October 2026
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2024-11-25 allowed

STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND OTHERS vs DR. RAO, V.B.J. CHELIKANI AND OTHERS

Bench: 2 — Sanjiv Khanna, Dipankar Datta

In Brief

A State policy that preferentially allotted government land at basic rates to MPs, MLAs, IAS officers, Judges, and journalists violated constitutional equality. The Supreme Court held that while States may classify citizens, such classification must serve a legitimate public purpose and meet substantive equality standards. The Court found the policy arbitrary because it benefited already-privileged individuals while denying benefits to the disadvantaged, contrary to Articles 14 and the welfare State's purpose. The policy was quashed, and the State was directed to refund all amounts paid by allottees with interest.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Constitutional Law Article 14 - Equality Before Law Land Law Administrative Law Public Interest Litigation Government Policy Substantive Equality Classification Doctrine

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login