Breaking SUPREME COURT REAFFIRMS PUBLIC DOMAIN PROTECTION FOR DIGITAL LAWS
New Delhi · Monday, 21 September 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2017-01-31 allowed

State of Bihar & Ors vs Ramesh Prasad Verma (Dead) thr. Lrs

Bench: 2 — Amitava Roy

In Brief

The State of Bihar sought enhanced royalty on minerals extracted from the Pandai river basin at the rate of Rs.100 per cubic metre, applied retrospectively from 1 April 2001 (when the Notification dated 24.03.2001 took effect) rather than from 26 December 2001 (when specific areas were identified). The High Court limited royalty to the latter date, reasoning that lessees needed prior notice of affected areas to pass costs to purchasers. The Supreme Court held that the 26 December 2001 notification was merely clarificatory—identifying areas the earlier notification already contemplated—and therefore had retrospective effect. Clarificatory legal instruments, not being retrospective changes but declarations of existing law's meaning, do not require express statutory authorization. The respondents were liable to pay enhanced royalty from 1 April 2001.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Minerals Law Administrative Law Taxation & Royalty Statutory Interpretation Delegated Legislation

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login