Breaking SUPREME COURT REAFFIRMS PUBLIC DOMAIN PROTECTION FOR DIGITAL LAWS
New Delhi · Sunday, 20 September 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2017-08-18 allowed

State of Goa vs Jose Maria Albert Vales

Bench: 2 — Amitava Roy

In Brief

The Supreme Court clarified the procedure for trying perjury complaints filed by courts under Section 340 of the Criminal Procedure Code. When a witness recants sworn statements, courts can file complaints against them for giving false evidence. The Court held that such complaints must generally be treated as cases instituted on police report (using the expedited Section 238-243 procedure), not the detailed Section 244 procedure requiring full prosecution evidence before framing charges. However, the words 'as far as may be' in Section 343(1) permit Trial Magistrates to conduct summary inquiries in exceptional cases lacking preliminary inquiry materials. The High Court's order remanding the case was set aside, and the trial was allowed to proceed from the charge-framing stage.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Criminal Procedure Evidence Perjury False Evidence Judicial Procedure

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login