Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Monday, 10 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-04-12 disposed

State of Gujarat & Ors vs Utility Users Welfare Association & Ors

Bench: 2 — Sanjay Kishan Kaul

In Brief

The Electricity Act, 2003 establishes State and Central Regulatory Commissions to regulate electricity tariffs and related matters. The core issue was whether Section 84(2)—which uses the word "may"—mandates that a High Court Judge must chair the State Commission. The Supreme Court held that the provision is discretionary, not mandatory; States may but need not appoint a Judge as Chairperson. However, the Court ruled that for any adjudicatory functions, including dispute resolution between utilities, the Commission bench must include at least one member with substantial legal qualifications equivalent to High Court Judge standards, given the Commission's "trappings of a court."

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Statutory Interpretation Regulatory Law Energy and Electricity Regulation Administrative Law Constitutional Law Separation of Powers Rule of Law Judicial Review Tribunal Composition Adjudicatory Functions

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login