Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Sunday, 02 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2022-01-21 allowed

State of Gujarat vs Arcelor Mittal Nippon Steel India Limited

Bench: 2 — M.R. Shah, Sanjiv Khanna

In Brief

Arcelor Mittal Nippon Steel (formerly Essar Steel) claimed exemption from purchase tax on raw materials (natural gas and naphtha) under a 1992 industrial incentive scheme. Though it purchased these materials against proper declarations stating they would be used in its own manufacturing unit, it actually transferred them to an affiliated power company, which converted them into electricity that was then supplied back to the respondent for steel manufacturing. The Gujarat High Court upheld the exemption, relying on promissory estoppel. The Supreme Court reversed this decision, holding that exemption notifications must be strictly construed and the assessee must actually use the materials itself in its unit. Transferring exempted materials to another (non-eligible) entity breached the statutory conditions and the Form declaration. Promissory estoppel does not apply in taxation to override statutory eligibility requirements, especially when the beneficiary failed to meet core conditions or submitted false declarations. The demand for tax and penalty was restored.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Taxation Sales Tax Exemption Notifications Industrial Incentives Policy Statutory Interpretation Promissory Estoppel Tax Penalty Administrative Law

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login