Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Wednesday, 05 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2020-02-18 allowed

STATE OF MAHARSHTRA vs PAN INDIA PARYATAN LIMITED

Bench: 3 — Uday Umesh Lalit, Indu Malhotra, Hemant Gupta

In Brief

An amusement park operator challenged the entertainment tax rate levied on consolidated admission tickets under the Bombay Entertainments Duty Act, 1923. The High Court held that a 50% concession applied, resulting in a 3.75% rate for years 4-5. The Supreme Court reversed, holding that consolidated single-day admission tickets do not constitute a 'series of entertainments' under Section 3(2), which applies only to specified categories. Standard 15% duty under Section 3(1)(b) applies, with Section 3(5)(a) granting a tax holiday for years 1-3 and 50% reduction (7.5%) for years 4-5, then full 15% from year 6 onwards.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Tax Law Entertainment Duty Statutory Interpretation Amusement Parks Duty Concessions

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login