Breaking SUPREME COURT REAFFIRMS PUBLIC DOMAIN PROTECTION FOR DIGITAL LAWS
New Delhi · Sunday, 20 September 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2017-06-06 allowed

State of Punjab vs Jaswinder Singh

Bench: 2 — Sanjay Kumar, Alok Aradhe

In Brief

A railway conductor challenged his withholding of increments through an application before the prescribed authority under the Payment of Wages Act, 1936, claiming the disciplinary orders violated natural justice. The High Court allowed his plea, setting aside the disciplinary orders. The Supreme Court reversed this, holding that the prescribed authority has no jurisdiction to interfere with disciplinary proceedings or set aside such orders. The proper remedy was a statutory appeal or court proceedings, not an application under the Payment of Wages Act. The appeal was allowed and the respondent's application dismissed.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Administrative Law Labour Law Disciplinary Proceedings Jurisdiction Payment of Wages

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login