Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Saturday, 08 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-12-03 allowed

State of Punjab vs Rakesh Kumar

Bench: 3 — N.V. Ramana

In Brief

The Supreme Court held that possession of manufactured narcotic drugs in bulk quantities without valid authorization violates the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, not merely the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940. The Court clarified that the NDPS Act operates concurrently with the Drugs and Cosmetics Act and is not derogated by it. Section 8 of the NDPS Act prohibits possession of narcotic substances except for medical or scientific purposes under authorized conditions. The High Court erred in suspending the sentences of accused-respondents on the ground that such offences should be tried only under the Drugs and Cosmetics Act. The Court set aside the High Court's order and allowed the State's appeals, directing the accused-respondents back into custody.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Narcotic Drugs Criminal Procedure Sentencing Drug Trafficking Statutory Interpretation

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login