Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Monday, 10 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-02-21 partly_allowed

Suchet Singh Yadav & Ors vs Union of India & Ors

Bench: 2 — Ashok Bhushan

In Brief

Commissioned officers of India's defence forces who retired before 01 January 1996 sought pensions at a higher pay scale under a Government Order of 21 November 1997 implementing the Fifth Pay Commission. The Supreme Court held that this order applied only to officers still in service on 01 January 1996, not to those who had already retired. The subsequent order of 07 June 1999 on pensionary benefits made no provision for such upscaling; it ensured only that pensions be calculated at 50% of minimum revised pay for the rank held at retirement. No discrimination occurred as both pre- and post-1996 retirees received equal treatment under these orders. The Court distinguished Maj. K.G. Thomas (decided on admissions and confined to its facts) as inapplicable precedent. Appeals by defence officers were dismissed; appeals by the Union of India were allowed.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Armed Forces Law Pension Pay Scale Administrative Law Government Policies Fifth Pay Commission

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login