Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Monday, 10 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-03-09 dismissed

Sunil B. Naik vs Geowave Commander

Bench: 2 — Sanjay Kishan Kaul

In Brief

Two vessel owners, Sunil B. Naik and Yusuf Abdul Gani, sought to recover outstanding charter hire dues from Reflect Geophysical Pte. Ltd. by arresting the 'Geowave Commander', a specialized survey vessel that Reflect Geophysical had chartered from Master and Commander AS Norway under a bareboat charter. The appellants had separately provided support vessels under charter-hire agreements with Reflect Geophysical. The Supreme Court held that although Reflect Geophysical had de facto control of the Geowave Commander, it was not the de jure or beneficial owner. Consequently, the maritime claims arising from the appellants' agreements with Reflect Geophysical could not be enforced against the respondent vessel. A maritime claim requires identity between the person liable in personam and the vessel owner. The appellants had no contract with the vessel's registered owners and thus no basis to arrest it.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Admiralty Law Maritime Claims Ship Arrest Bareboat Charter Demise Charterer International Conventions Arrest Convention 1999 Beneficial Ownership In Rem Jurisdiction Commercial Dispute Contract Enforcement

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login