Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Saturday, 01 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2022-05-10 partly_allowed

Suresh Mahajan vs State of Madhya Pradesh & Anr

Bench: 3 — A.M. Khanwilkar

In Brief

The Supreme Court addressed the prolonged non-conduct of elections in over 23,000 local bodies in Madhya Pradesh, with the State citing ongoing delimitation and OBC reservation (triple test) compliance as justifications for delay. Striking down this reasoning, the Court held that the constitutional mandate under Articles 243-E and 243-U requires elected bodies to be installed within five years, and this cannot be delayed by administrative exercises like delimitation or triple test procedures. The State Election Commission must immediately notify election programmes based on existing ward delimitations, proceeding without OBC reservations until triple test compliance is complete in all respects. Future elections after compliance may incorporate OBC reservations accordingly.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Constitutional Law Local Self-Government Elections Administrative Law Other Backward Classes (OBC) Reservation

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login