Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Thursday, 06 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2019-09-11 allowed

SURINDER KAUR (D) TR.LR vs BAHADUR SINGH(D) TR.LRS

Bench: 2 — Deepak Gupta, Aniruddha Bose

In Brief

Mohinder Kaur agreed to sell agricultural land to Bahadur Singh in 1964 for Rs. 5,605, of which only Rs. 1,000 was paid upfront. Possession was given with an agreement that Singh would pay customary rent if the pending legal dispute took over a year to resolve. When the dispute was decided in 1977, Singh refused to execute the sale deed. Singh later sued for specific performance but had paid no rent in 13 years. The Supreme Court held that Singh, having failed to perform the essential obligation to pay customary rent, was not entitled to the discretionary remedy of specific performance. The Court ruled that specific performance requires performance of all essential contractual terms; equity weighed against Singh given his long non-payment and substantial benefit from the productive land."

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Contract Law Specific Performance Reciprocal Promises Property Law Discretionary Relief

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login