Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Friday, 07 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2019-05-29 dismissed

SURINDER SINGH DESWAL @ COL. S. S. DESWAL vs VIRENDER GANDHI

Bench: 2 — M.R. Shah, A.S. Bopanna

In Brief

Appellants convicted of cheque dishonor under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act challenged orders directing them to deposit 25% of the imposed fine/compensation pending their appeals. They argued that amended Section 148 of the N.I. Act (effective 1.9.2018) should not apply retrospectively to complaints filed before the amendment. The Supreme Court held that amended Section 148 applies to all pending appeals regardless of when complaints were filed, as the amendment is procedural and takes away no substantive vested rights. The word 'may' in Section 148 was read as creating an obligation to direct minimum 20% deposit, serving the legislative purpose of curbing delay tactics that compromise cheque transaction sanctity. The appeals were dismissed but the Court extended the deposit deadline by four weeks.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Negotiable Instruments Law Cheque Dishonor Criminal Appellate Procedure Section 138 of N.I. Act Statutory Interpretation Procedural vs. Substantive Law Retrospective Application of Law Suspension of Sentence Bail Conditions Code of Criminal Procedure Interpretation of 'May'

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login