Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Wednesday, 05 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2020-01-29 other

Sushila Aggarwal and others vs State (NCT of Delhi) and another

Bench: 5 — M.R. Shah, S. Ravindra Bhat, Arun Mishra, Indira Banerjee, Vineet Saran

In Brief

This landmark Supreme Court judgment resolved conflicting interpretations of Section 438 Cr.P.C. regarding anticipatory bail—pre-arrest bail protection for those apprehending arrest. The Court held that anticipatory bail should not be limited to a fixed duration; it normally continues until trial ends, and conditions are imposed based on case specifics rather than invariably. Personal liberty under Article 21 is paramount. The Court overruled restrictive precedents and reaffirmed that discretion should remain with superior courts, subject to judicial caution, not rigid formulae. Police retain investigative rights despite bail; safety comes through conditions and Section 439(2) powers to cancel bail if conditions are violated or new circumstances emerge."

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Criminal Procedure Anticipatory Bail Section 438 Personal Liberty Article 21

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login