Breaking SUPREME COURT REAFFIRMS PUBLIC DOMAIN PROTECTION FOR DIGITAL LAWS
New Delhi · Tuesday, 22 September 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2017-08-24 dismissed

Swami Om JI & Anr vs Union of India Thr. Cabinet Secretary & Ors

Bench: 2 — <UNKNOWN>, <UNKNOWN>

In Brief

Two citizens—Swami Om Ji and Mukesh Jain—filed a writ petition challenging the constitutional validity of the procedure for appointing the next Chief Justice of India, claiming it violated Articles 124(2), 124(3), and 124A of the Constitution. The petitioners submitted that the incumbent Chief Justice's recommendation of his successor was unlawful. The Supreme Court dismissed the petition, finding the petitioners' legal interpretations wholly misconceived. The Court clarified that Constitution Benches have established that the incumbent Chief Justice must make such recommendations to the President, and that Article 124A had been struck down as unconstitutional. The petition was filed at the eleventh hour (one working day before the swearing-in) without any allegations against the incoming Chief Justice, leading the Court to characterize it as a motivated publicity stunt. Costs of ₹10 lakh each were imposed on both petitioners.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Constitutional Law Judicial Appointments Chief Justice of India Writ Jurisdiction Article 124 of the Constitution Abuse of Court Jurisdiction

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login