Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Saturday, 08 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2019-01-29 dismissed

SWARAJ INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD vs KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LTD

Bench: 2 — Rohinton Fali Nariman, Navin Sinha

In Brief

This case addresses whether a secured creditor that has obtained a judgment from the Debts Recovery Tribunal can simultaneously file a winding-up petition under the Companies Act. The bank had advanced loans to the companies, obtained DRT orders for Rs. 48 crores, but recovery was unsuccessful. It then filed winding-up petitions. The companies argued that the Recovery of Debts Act bars such petitions and that a secured creditor must relinquish its security before petitioning for winding-up. The Supreme Court held that winding-up is not a debt recovery proceeding and thus not barred by the Recovery Act; a secured creditor need not give up security until the claims-proving stage after a winding-up order; and pursuing both remedies simultaneously is legitimate pursuit of a single right in a larger degree. Appeals dismissed.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Corporate Insolvency Winding-up and Liquidation Debt Recovery Secured Creditors Banks and Financial Institutions Procedure and Jurisdiction Competition of Remedies

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login