Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Thursday, 06 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2019-08-30 dismissed

SYED ZAINUL ABEDEEN vs RAJASTHAN BOARD OF MUSLIM WAQF

Bench: 3 — N.V. Ramana, Indira Banerjee, Ajay Rastogi

In Brief

The appellant sought to challenge the classification of a property as Wakf-Al-Allah (for religious purposes) rather than Wakf-Alal-Aulad (benefiting descendants). The property was registered through a Survey Commissioner's report in 1965 and published in the Official Gazette in December 1965, but the suit was filed in January 1967—beyond the one-year limitation period prescribed by Section 6 of the Wakf Act, 1954. The Court upheld the concurrent findings of all three lower courts that the suit was barred by limitation. The Court held that Section 6's one-year period applies to all classification disputes, that Article 113 of the Limitation Act does not override it, and that Section 56's notice requirement does not extend the deadline. The appeal was dismissed.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Wakf Law Limitation Act Civil Procedure Administrative Law Statutory Interpretation

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login