Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Thursday, 30 July 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2025-11-17 partly_allowed

T. N. GODAVARMAN THIRUMULPAD vs UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS

Bench: 3 — B.R. Gavai, Augustine George Masih, A.S. Chandurkar

In Brief

The Supreme Court comprehensively addressed wildlife conservation governance in India's 51 Tiger Reserves through this judgment in the continuing T.N. Godavarman proceedings. It approved expert committee recommendations establishing that Tiger Safaris may operate in buffer zones only if paired with rescue centres and sourcing conflict/injured tigers from the same landscape—prohibited entirely in core habitats. The Court mandated Eco-Sensitive Zone notifications for all reserves within one year, designated all reserves as "Silence Zones" under noise rules, required Tiger Conservation Plans within three months, and ordered strict prohibition of commercial mining, polluting industries, and night tourism. Critically, it directed pan-India implementation of NTCA guidelines as binding requirements, established human resource and funding frameworks, and imposed ecological restoration obligations for Corbett Reserve estimated at ₹29.8 crores. States must fill vacancies, create specialist cadres, and provide enhanced benefits comparable to paramilitary forces, with monitoring by the Central Empowered Committee.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Wildlife Conservation Tiger Reserves Eco-Sensitive Zones Environmental Protection Forest Management Tourism Regulation Protected Areas National Tiger Conservation Authority Tiger Safari Ecological Restoration Conservation Law

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login