Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Saturday, 01 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2023-01-05 allowed

TATA Sons Pvt Ltd (Formerly TATA Sons Ltd) vs Siva Industries and Holdings Ltd & Ors

Bench: 2 — Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha

In Brief

Tata Sons sought to continue arbitration proceedings against Siva Industries before a sole arbitrator appointed in 2018. When the defendant entered insolvency, the proceedings were stayed. After the moratorium was lifted and Section 29A of the Arbitration Act was amended in 2019 to exclude international commercial arbitrations from the mandatory 12-month award timeline, Tata Sons requested the proceedings continue without seeking a formal extension. The Supreme Court held that the 2019 amendment, being remedial and non-conferring of new liabilities, applies retrospectively to all pending arbitrations. International commercial arbitrations must now only endeavour to conclude within 12 months, not meet mandatory deadlines. The sole arbitrator may extend timelines through procedural directions without formal court intervention.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Arbitration and Conciliation International Commercial Arbitration Statutory Construction Procedural Law – Retrospective Application Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process Share Subscription Agreements Arbitral Award Timeline

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login