Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Monday, 10 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-07-17 partly_allowed

Tehseen S. Poonawalla vs Union of India and others

Bench: 3 — Dipak Misra

In Brief

The Supreme Court addressed writ petitions challenging mob violence and vigilante lynching, particularly by cow protection groups. While declining to declare the state animal preservation acts unconstitutional, the Court recognized a constitutional duty of the State to prevent vigilantism and protect citizens' fundamental rights. The judgment upheld the rule of law against private enforcement and affirmed that crime transcends religion, caste or class. The Court issued comprehensive preventive (Nodal Officers, intelligence gathering, social media regulation), remedial (compensation schemes, fast-track trials) and punitive measures (departmental action for negligent officials). It recommended that Parliament create a separate lynching offence, emphasizing that fear of law underpins civilized society.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Constitutional Law Mob Violence Lynching Vigilantism Cow Protection Public Law Human Rights Rule of Law Social Media Regulation Criminal Procedure Victim Compensation Secular State

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login