Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Thursday, 30 July 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2025-12-04 dismissed

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA & ANR vs TAGHAR VASUDEVA AMBRISH & ANR

Bench: 2 — J.B. Pardiwala, K.V. Viswanathan

In Brief

A residential property with 42 rooms in Bengaluru was leased to a company (DTwelve Spaces) that sub-leased rooms to students and working professionals as hostel/PG accommodation. The owner sought GST exemption under Entry 13 of Notification No. 9/2017, which exempts 'renting of residential dwelling for use as residence'. The tax authority denied the exemption, arguing the lessee (company) did not itself use the premises as residence. The High Court allowed the owner's challenge, holding that the exemption applies when the ultimate use is residential, regardless of the lessee's identity. The Supreme Court upheld this decision, ruling that the exemption is activity-specific (renting for residence), not lessee-specific. Since students and professionals actually lived there, the exemption applies despite the intermediary company's involvement. The decision protects residential rental income from GST when ultimately used for residence.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

GST/IGST Tax Exemptions Residential Property Advance Ruling Statutory Interpretation Purposive Construction

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login