Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Friday, 31 July 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2024-07-08 dismissed

THE STATE OF PUNJAB vs PARTAP SINGH VERKA

Bench: 2 — Sudhanshu Dhulia, Prasanna B. Varale

In Brief

Dr. Partap Singh Verka, a public servant doctor, was accused of demanding and receiving bribes. Although initially not named in the chargesheet, the trial court allowed an application under Section 319 of the Criminal Procedure Code to summon him as an accused. The High Court set aside this order, finding that prior sanction under Section 19 of the Prevention of Corruption Act was mandatory but had not been obtained. The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision, holding that Section 19's sanction requirement is absolute and mandatory for all corruption offences against public servants, and cannot be bypassed even when invoking Section 319 of the CrPC.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Criminal Procedure Prevention of Corruption Act Public Servants Sanction Requirements Cognizance Bribery

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login