Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Friday, 07 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2019-02-11 allowed

THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH vs FAQUIREY

Bench: 2 — L. Nageswara Rao, Sanjay Kishan Kaul

In Brief

The State of Uttar Pradesh appealed against a High Court judgment that had reduced the respondent's conviction from murder (Section 302 IPC) to culpable homicide (Section 304 Part I IPC), with a corresponding reduction in sentence from life imprisonment to 10 years. The respondent had shot and killed the deceased during a village panchayat, claiming he acted under grave and sudden provocation. The Supreme Court held that mere suspicion, without any overt act by the deceased, does not constitute grave and sudden provocation. Since the respondent's provocation was self-initiated and based on pre-existing animosity, the exception to murder was inapplicable. The Court restored the trial court's conviction for murder and directed the respondent to surrender to serve the remaining sentence.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Criminal Law Homicide Exceptions to Murder Provocation Indian Penal Code

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login