Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Sunday, 02 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2022-02-04 allowed

The State of Uttarakhand vs Sachendra Singh Rawat

Bench: 2 — M.R. Shah, B.V. Nagarathna

In Brief

The State of Uttarakhand appealed against a High Court decision that downgraded a murder conviction to culpable homicide not amounting to murder. The accused had attacked the deceased with a wooden club (Phakadiyat) at midnight, hours after an initial quarrel at a wedding ceremony, inflicting multiple severe blows to the head causing skull fracture, brain laceration, and multiple stitched wounds. The High Court had invoked Exception 4 to Section 300 IPC (sudden fight without premeditation), characterizing it as a spontaneous outbreak of passion. The Supreme Court held that the High Court erred gravely: the subsequent midnight attack was not a spontaneous sudden fight but a separate incident occurring hours later; the force and nature of injuries demonstrated clear intention to cause death; and Exception 4 did not apply. The Court restored the murder conviction and life imprisonment sentence.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Criminal Law Murder Culpable Homicide Intention and Knowledge Exception 4 Section 300 IPC Sudden Fight Head Injuries Appreciation of Evidence High Court Error

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login