Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Wednesday, 05 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2020-04-17 allowed

Thingujam Achouba Singh & Ors vs H. Nabachandra Singh & Ors. etc

Bench: 2 — <UNKNOWN>, <UNKNOWN>

In Brief

Thingujam Achouba Singh challenged a High Court decision that struck down amended recruitment rules for a Director position on the grounds that the rules were not formally notified. The Supreme Court held that amendments made in accordance with the Society's Rules, Regulations and Bye-Laws, and approved by the Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, are valid and enforceable even without formal notification. The Court affirmed that eligibility criteria and any relaxations are solely within the employer's discretion—no candidate can claim relaxation as a matter of right. Technical procedural objections raised by authorities cannot be dismissed, and courts cannot grant relief in forms not officially notified. The appeal was allowed."

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Constitutional Law Service Law Recruitment Rules Administrative Law Writ Jurisdiction

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login