Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Thursday, 30 July 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2024-12-19 dismissed

TIRITH KUMAR & ORS vs DADURAM & ORS

Bench: 2 — C.T. Ravikumar, Sanjay Karol

In Brief

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's judgment that the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 does not apply to members of the Sawara tribe, a notified Scheduled Tribe under Article 342 of the Constitution. Despite the trial court finding that the parties were 'sufficiently Hinduised' and should be governed by Hindu law, the Court held that Section 2(2) of the Act explicitly excludes Scheduled Tribes unless the Central Government issues a de-notification. Daughters of a tribe member cannot claim inheritance rights under Hindu succession law merely by asserting they follow Hindu principles. The Court affirmed that equity and good conscience may supplement succession law where the Hindu Succession Act does not apply, but such principles cannot override statutory law. The Court dismissed the appeal while directing the Central Government to consider amending the Act to grant equal succession rights to tribal women, noting the anomaly of denying such rights seventy years after the Constitution's adoption.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Constitutional Law Succession Law Scheduled Tribes Hindu Succession Act Equality Rights Justice and Equity

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login