Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Thursday, 30 July 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2025-02-04 dismissed

Union of India and another vs Tarsem Singh and others

Bench: 2 — Surya Kant, Ujjal Bhuyan

In Brief

The National Highways Authority of India sought clarification that its earlier judgment (Tarsem Singh, 2019)—which established that solatium and interest must be paid to landowners whose land was acquired between 1997 and 2015—should apply only prospectively. The Supreme Court rejected this request, holding that the judgment operates retrospectively. The Court reasoned that applying it only from 2019 would create unjust discrimination between similarly situated landowners based solely on the date of acquisition. Since Section 3J of the National Highways Act (which denied these benefits) was unconstitutional, the gap must be remedied. The Court emphasized that granting statutory compensation benefits does not reopen concluded cases but rectifies past unconstitutional denial, consistent with Article 14 equality principles.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Land Acquisition Constitutional Law National Highways Right to Fair Compensation Article 14 Solatium and Interest Statutory Benefits Doctrine of Immutability Finality of Judgment

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login