In Brief
The Union of India challenged High Court orders that allowed candidates who indicated service preferences to be appointed to alternative services where they scored higher marks. The Supreme Court held that when candidates expressly indicate preference in recruitment applications and the notification forbids changes, they are bound by that preference. Additionally, candidates from one border district category cannot claim eligibility for vacancies earmarked for another border district category, even if no formal domicile certificate requirement applies. The Court ruled preferences are binding substantive choices, not mere indications, and recruitment notification categories must be respected. The appeals were allowed and High Court orders set aside.
The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.