Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Monday, 03 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2021-08-27 allowed

UNION OF INDIA & ANR vs S. NARASIMHULU NAIDU (DEAD) THROUGH LRS. AND ORS

Bench: 2 — Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Hemant Gupta

In Brief

The Union of India appealed against an order that found it guilty of land grabbing under the Andhra Pradesh Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, 1982. The respondents claimed ownership of 7128.5 sq. yards of land, relying partly on findings in a previous suit where only 4971.5 sq. yards was disputed. The Supreme Court held that res judicata does not apply between co-defendants when the subject matters are distinct and the earlier decree concerned only the land sold, not the remaining land retained by the respondents' father. The Union proved valid title through State transfer (1956) and possession delivery (1958), evidenced by official records carrying statutory presumption of correctness. The Union was therefore not a land grabber. The appeal was allowed and the land grabbing application dismissed.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Land Law Civil Procedure Res Judicata Adverse Possession Property Law Constitutional Law

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login