Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Wednesday, 05 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2020-02-14 disposed

UNION OF INDIA & ORS vs M/S. ASSOCIATED CONTAINER TERMINAL LTD

Bench: 3 — A.M. Khanwilkar, Hemant Gupta, Dinesh Maheshwari

In Brief

The Supreme Court addressed the dispute over apportionment of sale proceeds when the warehouse-keeper sells imported goods due to non-payment of warehouse charges. Imported CTV kits remained in warehouse beyond the permitted period; the warehouse-keeper sold them and recovered warehouse charges. The question was whether customs duty should be calculated on the sale price or on the duty-rate as on the expiry date of the warehousing period. The Court held that customs duty must be calculated on sale proceeds received (working backwards) per the Board's 2001 circular, not the duty rate on the deemed removal date. The sale proceeds must be apportioned per Section 150(2) in prescribed priority. The Kesoram judgment, requiring duty assessment on the deemed removal date, was distinguished as inapplicable to sales under Section 63."

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Customs Law Warehousing Duty Assessment Sale Proceeds Warehouse Charges Revenue Recovery

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login