Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Monday, 03 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2021-06-17

Union of India & Ors vs Raj Grow Impex LLP & Ors

Bench: 3 — Dinesh Maheshwari

In Brief

The Supreme Court upheld absolute confiscation of yellow peas and pulses imported in violation of quantitative restrictions set by the Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992. The importers, relying on interim orders from High Courts, imported commodities exceeding permitted quotas and without necessary licenses. The Court clarified that such imports constitute 'prohibited goods' under the Customs Act, not merely 'restricted goods.' While discretion exists under Section 125 of the Customs Act to release prohibited goods on payment of redemption fine, the Court held that this discretion must be exercised based on relevant considerations, including the statutory purpose of protecting farmers and the domestic agricultural market. Since importers acted without bona fide belief and for personal profit, absolute confiscation was the proper exercise of discretion, though re-export was permitted as an alternative. The Court also criticized interim orders that undermined trade policy enforcement.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Customs Law Foreign Trade Regulation Administrative Law Discretion and Judicial Review Interim Relief Trade Policy Confiscation and Penalty Agricultural Economics Policy Import Restrictions

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login