Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Thursday, 30 July 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2026-02-12 partly_allowed

Union of India through its Secretary & Ors vs SGT Girish Kumar and Ors. Etc

Bench: 2 — Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, Alok Aradhe

In Brief

The Supreme Court resolved conflicting decisions of the Armed Forces Tribunal regarding arrears of disability pension payable to ex-servicemen. The Court held that disability pension is a vested substantive right, not ex-gratia bounty. Once the right to broad-banding of disability pension was judicially affirmed by the Court's 2014 decision in Ram Avtar, entitlement to full arrears cannot be restricted by limitation periods or laches. The Court rejected the government's argument to cap arrears to three years, finding it would amount to unlawful deprivation of property. Ex-servicemen are entitled to arrears from specified cut-off dates (1996 or 2006) with 6% interest, as the government itself had acknowledged through policy decisions before contesting individual claims.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Armed Forces Law Pension Law Administrative Law Disability Benefits Limitation Vested Rights Ex-servicemen

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login