Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Monday, 03 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2020-08-28 dismissed

UNION OF INDIA vs ASHOK KUMAR SHARMA AND OTHERS

Bench: 2 — Sanjay Kishan Kaul, K.M. Joseph

In Brief

The Supreme Court held that offences under Chapter IV of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 can only be prosecuted by Inspectors, authorized Gazetted officers, aggrieved persons, or recognized consumer organizations under Section 32 of the Act. Police Officers cannot register FIRs or investigate such offences under the Code of Criminal Procedure. However, Drugs Inspectors possess power to arrest persons accused of cognizable offences under Chapter IV without warrant, derived from Section 22(1)(d) of the Act. The Court dismissed the appeal and upheld the High Court's order quashing the FIR, while clarifying that this ruling operates prospectively from the date of judgment, given prior arrests by police officers under the earlier understanding of law.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Criminal Procedure Drugs and Cosmetics Act Police Powers Cognizable Offences Arrest without Warrant Investigation Procedure Prosecution

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login