Breaking SUPREME COURT REAFFIRMS PUBLIC DOMAIN PROTECTION FOR DIGITAL LAWS
New Delhi · Sunday, 20 September 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2016-01-13 allowed

United India Insurance Co. Ltd vs Orient Treasures Pvt. Ltd

Bench: 2 — Abhay Manohar Sapre

In Brief

United India Insurance Co. Ltd, an insurer, appealed against a National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission order that partly awarded Rs. 36,10,211 to a jewellery shop owner for stolen ornaments. The loss occurred during a night-time burglary when items were kept in a window display and outside the safe. The Supreme Court held that clauses 4 and 5 of the proposal form, read with clause 12 of the policy, plainly stated such items were not covered at night. Since the language was unambiguous, the contra proferentem rule did not apply. The Court allowed the insurance company's appeal, setting aside the commission's award, and held the insurer was not liable for loss of items kept in violation of policy exclusions.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Insurance Law Consumer Protection Contract Interpretation Policy Exclusions Burglary

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login