In Brief
A Deputy Director of Education committed suicide, and his wife filed a complaint against two senior officers, alleging they caused his death through work pressure and harassment. The High Court quashed proceedings against one officer but upheld the FIR against the appellant. The Supreme Court held that allegations supported only by the wife's assertions, without a suicide note, were wholly inadequate to establish abetment to suicide under Section 306 IPC. Routine supervisory actions—assigning work, suspending salary—do not constitute criminal conduct. The Court quashed all proceedings, holding that the interest of justice demanded their dismissal.
The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.