Breaking Supreme Court of India Advocates Balanced Approach to Diwali Firecracker Regulations
New Delhi · Saturday, 07 November 2026
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2017-04-13 allowed

Vaneet Mahajan vs State of Punjab and Ors

Bench: 2 — <UNKNOWN>, <UNKNOWN>

In Brief

A practicing advocate was attacked by 11 persons armed with deadly weapons (swords, dastars, baseball bats) at the instance of a Cabinet Minister, allegedly to punish him for instituting cases against the Minister. The victim suffered 11 injuries including 2 grievous injuries; his brother and employee were also injured. The Sessions Judge framed charges under Section 307 IPC (attempt to murder), but the High Court deleted that charge, finding insufficient proof of intention to kill at the charge stage. The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, holding that intention to kill is a factual question for trial, not for final determination at charge-framing. When multiple armed attackers target unarmed persons with deadly weapons, the Court may reasonably presume intention to cause death.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Criminal Law Attempt to Murder Grievous Injuries Section 307 IPC Charge Framing Criminal Procedure

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login