Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Monday, 03 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2021-01-19 allowed

VENIGALLA KOTESWARAMMA vs MALEMPATI SURYAMBA & ORS

Bench: 3 — Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Dinesh Maheshwari, Hrishikesh Roy

In Brief

Venigalla Koteswaramma sought partition of properties left by her deceased step-mother among herself and three siblings. The trial court held that a contested agreement for sale and will produced by the defendants were fabricated and decreed the partition. The High Court reversed this regarding the agreement, holding it valid despite rejecting the will. The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, holding that: (1) the appeal was incompetent after one respondent died without substitution, as any decree would contradict the finalized decree against the deceased; (2) partition suits do not require plaintiff to seek declaration against defendant-raised documents; and (3) the agreement lacked credible proof and was intertwined with the rejected will, making its invalidity inevitable.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Civil Procedure Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 Abatement of appeals Partition Transfer of Property Wills and Succession Evidence

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login