Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Saturday, 08 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-09-18 allowed

Venugopal Padayachi (Dead) Through LRs vs V. Pichaikaran (Dead) Through LRs

Bench: 2 — Uday Umesh Lalit

In Brief

A mortgagor filed suit to redeem a simple mortgage dated 1959 and recover possession of the mortgaged property. The mortgagee claimed he had taken possession under an unregistered document dated 1960 and acquired title by adverse possession. The trial court found the suit barred by limitation as it was filed more than twelve years after adverse possession commenced. The High Court wrongly interfered, based on an "understanding" between parties not supported by evidence. The Supreme Court held that once a mortgagee claims absolute ownership, his possession becomes adverse; if redemption is not sued within twelve years, the claim is barred. The trial court's judgment dismissing the suit was correct and upheld."

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Property Law Adverse Possession Mortgage Limitation Land Rights

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login