Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Friday, 07 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2019-02-25 allowed

Vijay Hathising Shah & Anr vs Gitaben Parshottamdas Mukhi & Ors

Bench: 2 — Abhay Manohar Sapre

In Brief

Vijay Hathising Shah appealed against a High Court order that allowed the respondent's application to amend her plaint in a partition suit. The Trial Court had rejected the amendment application as wholly belated, filed when trial was nearly complete. The Supreme Court held that the Trial Court was correct. The Court found the amendment was filed too late, when the case was ready for final arguments, and the suit could be decided without it. The appeal was allowed, the High Court order was set aside, and the Trial Court was directed to decide the civil suit within one month."

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Civil Procedure Amendment of Plaint High Court Review Trial Conduct

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login