In Brief
Vinay Sharma sought to challenge the President's rejection of his mercy petition, claiming violations of his right to information, that relevant materials were withheld, that he suffered torture and mental illness, that he was illegally confined in solitary conditions, and that the decision was biased. The Supreme Court examined the file and found that all relevant case records, medical reports, and social investigation materials were properly placed before the President. The petitioner was in protective custody, not solitary confinement. The Court held the rejection met constitutional standards and dismissed the petition, finding no merit in any of the grounds raised.
The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.