Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Friday, 31 July 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2024-03-01 allowed

VINAYAK PURSHOTTAM DUBE (DECEASED), THROUGH LRs vs JAYASHREE PADAMKAR BHAT & OTHERS

Bench: 2 — B.V. Nagarathna, Ujjal Bhuyan

In Brief

The complainants entered into a 1996 Development Agreement with a sole proprietor-developer requiring him to construct residential flats, complete various works, and obtain certificates. After his death, the complainants pursued consumer complaints to enforce the agreement against his legal representatives (widow and two sons). The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission directed the legal representatives to perform all obligations, including construction and obtaining approvals. The Supreme Court held that while the deceased's estate remains liable for monetary decrees, personal obligations requiring the proprietor's individual skill and expertise terminate on his death and cannot be imposed on legal representatives. Appeals allowed in part; monetary liabilities to be discharged from the estate, but non-monetary obligations requiring personal performance were set aside.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Succession Law Contract Law Consumer Protection Development Agreements Death of Party to Litigation Legal Representatives Sole Proprietorship Personal Obligations vs Estate Liability Decrees and Execution

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login